Since the amount of your work in print should be about 20 A4 sheets, it is clear that reviewers (with rare exceptions) will not read your work completely. Usually, the review is the material that describes in detail your practical part and conclusions. In this regard, great attention is paid to the design of the introduction of research paper. The first impression of the research you have done is shaped precisely by the design and content of the introduction. Thus it is necessary to competently arrange this part of the work. For this reason, I would like to give some recommendations.
According to the design of the introduction of research paper:
1. Introduction and conclusion should be issued in accordance with GOST.
2. The introduction should include the following components:
a) the relevance of the work. Here it is briefly necessary to show what problems in your area of research have not been solved to date. It is important to make references to scientific articles that mention the interest of scientists in the problem.
b) The purpose of the study. Must be related to the stated research topic.
c) The formulation of the subject and object of study. Remember that the object of study is formulated more broadly than the subject. In fact, the subject of study is what is studied in the object. (Example: The object of study is the electrical properties of a ferromagnetic fluid. The subject of the study is the conductivity of a magnetic fluid in a uniform magnetic field).
d) Objectives of the study (what you will do to achieve the goal). It is necessary to set as many tasks as you really can solve. It is enough to set 2 – 3 tasks. Usually, each problem is solved in a separate chapter or paragraph. At the same time, remember that tasks should be research, not technical. Feel the difference: a) find out the conditions for the occurrence of an interference pattern, b) get a ferromagnetic fluid, c) develop an experimental setup – these are all examples of technical work items, such as “open a book on page 17 and rewrite the formula in the box”, and no tasks. Research tasks are formulated as follows: a) analyze the experimental data obtained taking into account measurement errors; c) determine the advantages and disadvantages of the proposed method in comparison with alternative ones, etc.